Comments on: How to ensure your SEO Strategy Fails like a Champion http://www.searchbrat.com/how-to-ensure-your-seo-strategy-fails-like-a-champion/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=how-to-ensure-your-seo-strategy-fails-like-a-champion :: Searchbrat.com Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:12:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Toronto Injury Lawyers http://www.searchbrat.com/how-to-ensure-your-seo-strategy-fails-like-a-champion/comment-page-1/#comment-4828 Toronto Injury Lawyers Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:13:05 +0000 http://www.searchbrat.com/?p=480#comment-4828 Very professional Write up ...mate i want to know more about SERM can u help me Very professional Write up …mate i want to know more about SERM can u help me

]]> By: SEO SpyGlass Told Me To Buy Links …. OK THEN !!! :: Searchbrat Blog http://www.searchbrat.com/how-to-ensure-your-seo-strategy-fails-like-a-champion/comment-page-1/#comment-4796 SEO SpyGlass Told Me To Buy Links …. OK THEN !!! :: Searchbrat Blog Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:13:23 +0000 http://www.searchbrat.com/?p=480#comment-4796 [...] competitive analysis tools and both of those tools deliver. Why do you need this, well remember in SEO Strategies that fail I mentioned being a greedy f*cking pig. You need to get your head around link analysis and link [...] [...] competitive analysis tools and both of those tools deliver. Why do you need this, well remember in SEO Strategies that fail I mentioned being a greedy f*cking pig. You need to get your head around link analysis and link [...]

]]> By: Leo Saraceni http://www.searchbrat.com/how-to-ensure-your-seo-strategy-fails-like-a-champion/comment-page-1/#comment-4742 Leo Saraceni Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:15:53 +0000 http://www.searchbrat.com/?p=480#comment-4742 Hey Kieran, Great list, specially #1. Competitive analysis online is one tough topic to address, because they all seem unique in their own way. For example: does Mashable have a competition? Is Techcrunch part of it? hard to define where they compete and where they dont. But hey, great content. And nice use of the RETWEET SNIPPET! Leo Hey Kieran,

Great list, specially #1. Competitive analysis online is one tough topic to address, because they all seem unique in their own way. For example: does Mashable have a competition? Is Techcrunch part of it? hard to define where they compete and where they dont.

But hey, great content. And nice use of the RETWEET SNIPPET!

Leo

]]> By: Kieran Flanagan http://www.searchbrat.com/how-to-ensure-your-seo-strategy-fails-like-a-champion/comment-page-1/#comment-4740 Kieran Flanagan Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:04:50 +0000 http://www.searchbrat.com/?p=480#comment-4740 Hey David Thanks for stopping by and posting such great feedback. I would totally agree you could probably rank a flash site above a text, I know you guys and know you are good :) I know Google is expanding it's indexing of flash sites. I do however still feels flash restricts you in terms copy + internal links. Maybe I was a little harsh flash !!! Thanks again Hey David

Thanks for stopping by and posting such great feedback. I would totally agree you could probably rank a flash site above a text, I know you guys and know you are good :)

I know Google is expanding it’s indexing of flash sites. I do however still feels flash restricts you in terms copy + internal links.

Maybe I was a little harsh flash !!!

Thanks again

]]> By: David Quaid http://www.searchbrat.com/how-to-ensure-your-seo-strategy-fails-like-a-champion/comment-page-1/#comment-4738 David Quaid Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:20:02 +0000 http://www.searchbrat.com/?p=480#comment-4738 Not sure I totally agree with the no-flash rule - I hear what you are saying but we've recently seen Google become quite good at indexing flash content. I don't think flash only - or worse, image + text-in-image only - sites work but I think Flash is getting a bit beat up - its like the rule is black-n-white, which it isn't. I wouldn't discourage flash at all, and I bet I could rank a flash only site over a text site - as I dont think text on-site helps towards ranking (in fact I can prove it) - so, my point is - there is nothing wrong with flash on websites at all - lets not end up with a blanket ban. Flash, per se, isn't bad for SEO. Not sure I totally agree with the no-flash rule – I hear what you are saying but we’ve recently seen Google become quite good at indexing flash content. I don’t think flash only – or worse, image + text-in-image only – sites work but I think Flash is getting a bit beat up – its like the rule is black-n-white, which it isn’t.

I wouldn’t discourage flash at all, and I bet I could rank a flash only site over a text site – as I dont think text on-site helps towards ranking (in fact I can prove it) – so, my point is – there is nothing wrong with flash on websites at all – lets not end up with a blanket ban. Flash, per se, isn’t bad for SEO.

]]> By: Kieran Flanagan http://www.searchbrat.com/how-to-ensure-your-seo-strategy-fails-like-a-champion/comment-page-1/#comment-4714 Kieran Flanagan Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:10:11 +0000 http://www.searchbrat.com/?p=480#comment-4714 Cheers Ed, I couldn't agree more with you on that point. Great content is always the best "link strategy". I just think most people would rather believe their is a secret formula to link building that doesn't involve as much work !! Cheers Ed,

I couldn’t agree more with you on that point. Great content is always the best “link strategy”. I just think most people would rather believe their is a secret formula to link building that doesn’t involve as much work !!

]]> By: Ed http://www.searchbrat.com/how-to-ensure-your-seo-strategy-fails-like-a-champion/comment-page-1/#comment-4713 Ed Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:06:36 +0000 http://www.searchbrat.com/?p=480#comment-4713 nice list - especially point 6 :) you should add ignore producing valuable content of any kind as no. 2 - valuable content will naturally attract valuable links nice list – especially point 6 :)

you should add ignore producing valuable content of any kind as no. 2 – valuable content will naturally attract valuable links

]]>